You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
Repository navigation
Preserve review provenance marker for supersede-older-reviews #63264
submit-pull-request-review with footer: always and supersede-older-reviews: true emits a gh-aw-workflow-call-id marker in the safe-output tool call, but the marker is absent from the review body later returned by GitHub's pull-request review API. The native supersession handler therefore cannot match and dismiss an older REQUEST_CHANGES review from the same workflow.
Evidence
The rendered agent prompt required the marker.
The safe-output MCP log recorded a submit_pull_request_review body ending with: <!-- gh-aw-workflow-call-id: owner/repo/test-critic-review -->
The handler logged PR review footer mode set to "always" and PR review supersede mode enabled.
The created GitHub review body did not contain the marker, and the earlier blocking review remained CHANGES_REQUESTED.
Expected behavior
A review created by submit-pull-request-review retains a durable workflow-specific provenance marker that supersede-older-reviews can safely use to dismiss only older blocking reviews from the same workflow.
Suggested direction
Persist provenance outside sanitized review body content, or ensure the marker survives the safe-output/GitHub review submission path. Add an integration test that creates a blocking review, posts a clean replacement review, and asserts the old review becomes DISMISSED without affecting a different workflow's review.
Additional live evidence: supersede-older-reviews runs after every submitted review event, including a new REQUEST_CHANGES, so it can dismiss an earlier same-workflow blocking review and hide unresolved findings. The framework fix needs both durable persisted provenance and an explicit clean-comment-only supersession condition; the affected repository has disabled automatic supersession until then.
Activity
lxghtless commentedon Sep 24, 2026
Additional live evidence:
supersede-older-reviewsruns after every submitted review event, including a newREQUEST_CHANGES, so it can dismiss an earlier same-workflow blocking review and hide unresolved findings. The framework fix needs both durable persisted provenance and an explicit clean-comment-only supersession condition; the affected repository has disabled automatic supersession until then.pelikhan commentedon Sep 26, 2026
@lxghtless do you have an example of such filtering?
pelikhan commentedon Oct 1, 2026
@copilot use the suggested syntax in pr pull request review comments.