Skip to content

Add an FAQ page that search engines and AI assistants can quote - #218

Merged
lwwmanning merged 10 commits into
mainfrom
wm/faq-page
Nov 11, 2026
Merged

lwwmanning merged 10 commits into
mainfrom
wm/faq-page

Conversation

@lwwmanning

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

What changes

vortex.dev has a new page, /faq. It answers nine common questions about Vortex, for example how it compares to Parquet, when to use it, and how to install it. The page has FAQPage structured data with the same text, so search engines and AI assistants can quote the answers. The Parquet comparison, the adopters, and the install commands come from the homepage's data, so they stay current. The footer links the page on vortex.dev and on bench. The sitemap lists it, /llms.txt links it, and /llms-full.txt includes it.

How it was checked

bun run build, bun run test, bun run test:bench, bun run knip, and the typecheck pass. bun run verify passes against a local production build. It now checks that the FAQPage data has one question for each heading on the page. The axe run now includes /faq.

Footer, before and after (dark theme):

Before After
1440
390

The new page:

1440 390
  • Every commit is signed off (git commit -s), for the DCO check.
  • bun run check:ci passes.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

/faq answers the questions people ask search engines and AI assistants
about Vortex: what it is, how it compares to Parquet, when to use it,
why it is fast, whether the format is stable, how to install it, who
uses it, who maintains it, and where to get help. The comparison with
Parquet carries the homepage's figures from bench, and the adopters and
install commands come from the homepage's own lists, so the page cannot
fall behind them.

The page draws the design system's Article card, as a blog post does.
The footer links to it on both sites, the sitemap lists it, llms.txt
links it, and llms-full.txt gives it in full. verify checks that its
FAQPage data has one question per heading, and the axe run covers it.

Signed-off-by: Will Manning <will@willmanning.io>
Each figure now names its source and class: bench's results are public
benchmarks, and the GPU figure is an internal measurement, explained in
plain words after the list. The size tradeoff carries bench's number. No
sentence is over 25 words, the license line no longer repeats, and the
adopters are a list.

Signed-off-by: Will Manning <will@willmanning.io>
@vercel

vercel Bot commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Actions Updated
vortex.dev Ready Ready Preview Nov 11, 2026 6:33am UTC

Request Review

@chatgpt-codex-connector

chatgpt-codex-connector Bot commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Codex Review Summary: ✅ Completed

This comment shows the latest Codex review activity on this pull request.

Review Status Commit Review trigger
📝 Code Review ✅ Completed 2026-11-11T06:20:17.928362Z ccc2dda New commits
ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review" or "@codex security review".

Codex reacts with 👀 while any review is running, comments if it has suggestions, and reacts with 👍 once all reviews finish with no findings.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Nov 10, 2026 •

Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔦 Lighthouse audit

URL Perf A11y Best practices SEO
/ 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100
/bench 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100
/bench/chart/ct.eyJrIjoiQ29tcHJlc3Npb25UaW1lIiwiZGF0YXNldCI6ImFyYWRlIiwiZGF0YXNldF92YXJpYW50IjpudWxsfQ 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100
/blog 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100
/blog/btrblocks-compressor 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100 🟢 100

Run 42973302649 · 2026-11-11 06:36 UTC

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 38deb9bf16

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/lib/faq.ts Resolved
Comment thread src/lib/faq.ts Resolved
… as such

The answer to "Should I use Vortex instead of Parquet?" now lists only
the workloads where bench's newest verdict says Vortex is faster, names
any where Parquet is faster, and points to bench when its results could
not be read. The adopters answer, and the matching llms.txt line, now
say the list holds adopters and the projects Vortex works with.

Signed-off-by: Will Manning <will@willmanning.io>

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 07c08b328d

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/lib/faq.ts Resolved
Comment thread src/lib/faq.ts Resolved
The lead-in says "For most workloads, yes" only when Vortex wins more
than half the speed panels, and "It depends on the workload" when it
wins fewer. Parquet's size advantage drops out only when bench measures
Vortex's files as smaller or the same size; without a size verdict the
answer points to bench and keeps storage cost in the last sentence.

Signed-off-by: Will Manning <will@willmanning.io>
…arisons

A new answer says how Lance differs: a table format and a file format
with one name, with indexes and versions, where Vortex is only a file
format that table formats store. It lists bench's newest verdicts for
Vortex against Lance, and how each project is governed.

/faq now reads bench's TPC-H SF10 scores on DataFusion
(morePanelsFrom), and lists them after ClickBench in both comparisons.
The homepage table is unchanged, and does not depend on them.

Signed-off-by: Will Manning <will@willmanning.io>

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

Reviewed commit: 81bb943442

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Your team has set up Codex to review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

Codex can also answer questions or update the PR. Try commenting "@codex address that feedback".

Comment thread src/lib/faq.ts Resolved
The sentence on proposed table formats ended "has a proposal to." It
now says "has a proposal to store tables in Vortex files", and stands on
its own when no shipped table format is listed.

Signed-off-by: Will Manning <will@willmanning.io>
The Lance answer now says how the Vortex charter changes (two thirds of
the Technical Steering Committee and LF Projects' approval), and that
LanceDB, a private company, holds Lance's name and code rather than an
independent foundation.

Signed-off-by: Will Manning <will@willmanning.io>
…ents

The governance answer now lists the organizations Vortex's committers
and maintainers are affiliated with, and links the LF AI & Data press
release and the post on donating Vortex.

Signed-off-by: Will Manning <will@willmanning.io>
Signed-off-by: Will Manning <will@willmanning.io>
The answer said each release from 0.36.0 on reads files from any other
release from 0.36.0 on. The docs guarantee only that a release reads
files from earlier releases; an older reader needs the writer to target
an edition it supports. The answer now says so and links the docs'
versioning page.

Signed-off-by: Will Manning <will@willmanning.io>
@lwwmanning
lwwmanning merged commit 2606bcb into main Nov 11, 2026
20 checks passed
@lwwmanning
lwwmanning deleted the wm/faq-page branch November 11, 2026 06:56
lwwmanning added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2026
Signed-off-by: Will Manning <will@willmanning.io>

# Conflicts:
#	src/lib/faq.ts
lwwmanning added a commit to vortex-data/vortex that referenced this pull request Nov 11, 2026
## Summary

vortex.dev has a new FAQ page, https://vortex.dev/faq, from
vortex-data/vortex.dev#218. This PR links it from the docs: in the
footer before Charter, as the vortex.dev footer has it, in the project
page's links, and in the docs' llms.txt beside the homepage.

## Changes

`make -C docs html` builds with no warnings, and the built footer,
project page, and llms.txt each carry the link.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Signed-off-by: Will Manning <will@willmanning.io>

This branch was successfully deployed

1 active deployment
Preview — 308b5a5f Deployed Nov 11, 2026 by vercel[bot]
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant